Share
Commentary

'Body of Evidence' Emerging Tying Lynch, Comey Together in Massive Scandal

Share

There have long been suspicions among Republicans that the Obama administration’s Department of Justice and FBI coordinated with each other in regard to exonerating former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and ending the investigation of her scandalous use of a private email server.

Based on recent commentary from Republican North Carolina Rep. Mark Meadows, chairman of the House Freedom Caucus and member of the Oversight Committee, it would appear that a “growing body of evidence” has been uncovered to support and ultimately prove such coordination took place between former Attorney General Loretta Lynch and fired FBI Director James Comey, among others.

Independent Journal Review reported on Meadows’ remarks during a Thursday appearance on Fox News, in which the congressman revealed the existence of documents, emails and texts which would prove that Comey had lied under oath to Congress when he assured them there’d been no such coordination on the Clinton investigation.

“We have a number of documents, a growing body of evidence, that now would suggest that Director Comey, who under sworn testimony a number of times said, there was no coordination between Loretta Lynch’s DOJ and (Comey’s) FBI investigation,” stated Meadows.

“Not only was that false … but we have emails that would suggest that testimony was false, and at best misled the American public, at worst was lying to Congress,” he continued.

Trending:
Election Coverage 2024

“And here we are today with emails, text messages that says even the ‘no coordination’ message that Director Comey put out on that infamous day in July was actually suggested by the Department of Justice,” added Meadows.

Fox & Friends co-host Brian Kilmeade read portions of texts at that time between FBI agent Peter Strzok and attorney Lisa Page which noted the terrible “timing” of the announcement (that Lynch would accept whatever the FBI recommended) and how it would appear “choreographed.”

Kilmeade compared the back-and-forth in the messages to a “third-rate movie” and noted, “These people are supposed to be guarding our secrets and seeking truth and justice. They don’t even know how to secure their own texts.”

Newsmax noted that Meadows agreed that the texts between Strzok and Page about “timing” were interesting, but stated, “There is another email from the Department of Justice that would indicate that, on how to articulate the exoneration of Hillary Clinton.”

Do you believe Obama's DOJ and FBI colluded and coordinated with each other to exonerate Hillary Clinton prior to the election?

“So as you go further from another source, other than Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, within the Department of Justice, we now know that the ‘edits,’ that they had given edits to Director Comey, or at least the emails would suggest that.”

Meadows added that the revelation would seem to undercut and prove Comey’s narrative “inaccurate” that he is some sort of “boy scout” who was “above reproach.”

Kilmeade pointed out that both Comey and fired Deputy Director Andrew McCabe appeared to be “turning on each other” and surmised that the actual truth could emerge from their conflicting testimony.

Meadows agreed and stated, “What we have is beyond just the two of them though. It’s other people within the FBI and DOJ who know that the testimony that Director Comey gave before Congress was not entirely the whole truth and nothing but the truth.”

“As we look at that there is also additional evidence that would suggest that DOJ narrowed the scope of the Hillary investigation to make sure she was exonerated.”

Related:
New Polling Has Devastating News for Kamala Harris' Presidential Dream

https://youtu.be/hOhyuIWnh64

As has been suspected by some for quite some time, it appears that evidence has been unearthed which will expose actual “collusion” between sympathetic government officials with a goal toward protecting Hillary Clinton from criminal prosecution and clearing the way for her campaign for the presidency.

Truth and Accuracy

Submit a Correction →



We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

Tags:
, , , , , , , ,
Share
Ben Marquis is a writer who identifies as a constitutional conservative/libertarian. He has written about current events and politics for The Western Journal since 2014. His focus is on protecting the First and Second Amendments.
Ben Marquis has written on current events and politics for The Western Journal since 2014. He reads voraciously and writes about the news of the day from a conservative-libertarian perspective. He is an advocate for a more constitutional government and a staunch defender of the Second Amendment, which protects the rest of our natural rights. He lives in Little Rock, Arkansas, with the love of his life as well as four dogs and four cats.
Birthplace
Louisiana
Nationality
American
Education
The School of Life
Location
Little Rock, Arkansas
Languages Spoken
English
Topics of Expertise
Politics




Advertise with The Western Journal and reach millions of highly engaged readers, while supporting our work. Advertise Today.

Conversation