Share
Commentary

Clip of Tucker Carlson and Rachel Maddow from 2006 Resurfaces, Shows How Far MSNBC Has Fallen

Share

Editor’s Note: Our readers responded strongly to this story when it originally ran; we’re reposting it here in case you missed it.

In light of the increasing political polarization dividing the country, the idea of liberals and conservatives regularly crossing the streams to sit down with one another has become laughably unthinkable.

But not that long ago, liberals and conservatives could have civil political conversations without it devolving into insults and hysterics.

Nowadays it would seem absurd for personalities from these two camps to have friendly disagreements and exchange good-natured jabs on the air, but in 2006, it could happen.

And, indeed, it did.

Trending:
Election Coverage 2024

Two political commentators who couldn’t be further from each other on the political spectrum were apparently great friends and could amicably poke fun at each other over their political differences, as seen in an old MSNBC segment shared to the social media platform X.

Those commentators were conservative Tucker Carlson and liberal Rachel Maddow.

Has the American left gone off the deep end?

Some may have forgotten this, but Carlson spent over five years at CNN and three years at MSNBC before landing at Fox News in 2009, where he stayed until he was abruptly fired in 2023, prompting him to launch his own show on social media platform Twitter, which later changed its name to X.

Maddow started out in radio and was with the now-defunct left-wing talk radio network Air America from 2004 to 2008 before going to work at MSNBC. She was a liberal from the start and has only become more radically leftist in the years since.

In the 2006 segment with Carlson, Maddow was invited on the show to discuss the impending Democratic takeover of Congress.

After exchanging some pleasantries showing how much they clearly enjoyed talking with each other, Carlson began asked Maddow, “What’s the first thing — apart from nationalizing the railroads and passing the transgender amendment — Democrats are going to do when they take power?”

Maddow, after laughing at what at the time was a hyperbolic joke from Carlson, responded in kind: “Well, I mean, there’s a lot to get to right away. We have to make everybody get gay married, and we have to ban the Bible, and we have to send you to Guantanamo.”

Related:
People Who Were Actually in the Room with Trump Debunk Mainstream Media's Latest 'Hoax'

Their conversation continued along the same tenor, talking seriously about potential issues that might arise from a Democratic Congress while poking fun at each other’s political views in a good-natured fashion.

Even when they disagreed, the conversation was civil overall, as when Carlson referred to the 1994 Republican “Contract for America,” asking Maddow if she believed the Democrats had a similar plan for that November.

Maddow began, “The awkward thing about the legacy and the analogy of the ‘Contract for America’ history, is that the Republicans didn’t actually do any of those things they said they were going to do, they didn’t keep any of those promises.”

Carlson interjected, “No, actually, they did. I mean, some of them, maybe you could say that some of them weren’t worth doing, I mean, there were a lot of procedural changes … but they actually did do them.”

As Business Insider explained when revisiting Maddow and Carlson’s friendship, there were times when the disagreements got much more heated, as when Carlson and Maddow discussed a speech from Osama Bin Laden in January 2006.

Carlson contended, “I’m saying he’s criticizing Bush in exactly the same ways, with exactly the same terminology — it’s literally like he got the blast facts from [Democratic] HQ.” Maddow responded, “I’m actively angry that this is being turned into a political attack on Democrats.”

But, even then, the two remained friendly, with Maddow frequently appearing on Carlson’s show as a panelist and the two of them happily joking with each other over their political differences and opposing viewpoints.

To Maddow’s credit, though Carlson and Maddow find each other’s views abhorrent now, she expressed in a Vanity Fair interview that she would always owe Carlson a debt of gratitude for giving her that first big break on MSNBC, even though they probably would never again have an exchange like the one seen in this clip.

Could you imagine this same exchange shown in the clip happening today on a network as virulently left-wing as MSNBC?

Carlson and Maddow have progressed from friendly disagreements to becoming mortal ideological enemies, with Maddow consistently spreading fear-mongering, anti-Trump and anti-conservative smears on her show.

Carlson has become a more vocal proponent of his conservatism in the last few years, using his X show to pursue stories no major news network wants to touch, such as by interviewing Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Nowadays, Maddow and MSNBC have grown more ideologically extreme than ever before.

Indeed, Maddow and Carlson’s simple disagreements on Carlson’s show in 2006 would probably now be considered akin to enabling the rise of fascism, disassembling democracy, supporting genocide, or whatever other hyperbolic buzzwords are getting thrown around these days.

In many ways, leftist America has truly gone off the deep end.

And Maddow and Carlson’s friendship was just one of the many casualties.


A Note from Our Deputy Managing Editor:

 

I heard a chilling comment the other day: “We don’t even know if an election will be held in 2024.” 

 

That wasn’t said by a conspiracy theorist or a doomsday prophet. No, former U.S. national security advisor Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn said that to the founder of The Western Journal, Floyd Brown.

 

Gen. Flynn’s warning means that the 2024 election is the most important election for every single living American. If we lose this one to the wealthy elites who hate us, hate God, and hate what America stands for, we can only assume that 248 years of American history and the values we hold dear to our hearts may soon vanish.

 

The end game is here, and as Benjamin Franklin said, “We must all hang together, or assuredly we shall all hang separately.”

 

All of this means that without you, it’s over. We have the platform, the journalists, and the experience to fight back hard, but Big Tech is strangling us through advertising blacklists, shadow bans, and algorithms. Did you know that we’ve been blacklisted by 90% of advertisers? Without direct support from you, our readers, we can’t continue the fight.

 

Can we count on your support? It may not seem like much, but a Western Journal Membership can make all the difference in the world because when you support us directly, you cut Big Tech out of the picture. They lose control. 

 

A monthly Western Journal Membership costs less than one coffee and breakfast sandwich each month, and it gets you access to ALL of our content — news, commentary, and premium articles. You’ll experience a radically reduced number of ads, and most importantly you will be vitally supporting the fight for America’s soul in 2024.

 

We are literally counting on you because without our members, The Western Journal would cease to exist. Will you join us in the fight? 

 

Sincerely,

Josh Manning

Deputy Managing Editor

The Western Journal

Truth and Accuracy

Submit a Correction →



We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

Tags:
, , , , ,
Share

Advertise with The Western Journal and reach millions of highly engaged readers, while supporting our work. Advertise Today.

Conversation