Share
Commentary

The Only Thing Worse Than Democrats' Behavior During Trump's Speech Was Their Official Rebuttal

Share

The Democrats topped off their rough PR night on Tuesday with one of the worst, most incoherent rebuttals to a president’s speech to a joint session of Congress in recent memory.

The Democrats’ antics during President Donald Trump’s address included one lawmaker refusing to sit down and keep quiet, while others waved silly signs. And the Democrats could not even bring themselves to applaud a 13-year-old cancer patient being honored by the president. It was a shameful display.

Freshman Sen. Elissa Slotkin was given the task of making the Democrats’ case after Trump spoke, probably because she was perceived as the more moderate among the bunch, given her win in Michigan in November, a state the president carried in his seven swing-state sweep.

First, it should be noted that Slotkin cannot be held up as some kind of profile in courage because she conveniently did not vote on Monday for legislation to keep men out of women’s sports. That’s a bill that all her Democratic colleagues voted against advancing, despite the American people overwhelmingly supporting it by approximately 80 to 20 percent.

Slotkin delivered her 10-minute rebuttal Tuesday night in a polished enough manner; the problem was with the content of what she said.

The senator started out fine by giving her curriculum vitae as a former CIA officer who did three tours in Iraq and joined the agency in response to the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. In other words, no one can gainsay her patriotism.

But soon thereafter is when her rebuttal went off the rails.

Did you watch Trump’s speech?

“America wants change, but there’s a responsible way to make change and a reckless way. And we can make that change without forgetting who we are as a country and as a democracy,” Slotkin said.

So the senator then tried to make the argument that Trump is being reckless in his policies. You mean like closing down the border and removing criminal illegal aliens? How about his executive order keeping men out of women’s sports? Opening up federal land again to more oil and gas exploration, so the price of most everything comes down? Ending the war in Ukraine? Or rooting out waste and fraud in government?

These are all issues the American people support by overwhelming numbers.

Related:
Trump Issues Major Orders Restoring Columbus Day, But His Plan Doesn't Stop There

“While we’re on the subject of Elon Musk,” Slotkin said, “is there anyone in America who is comfortable with him and his gang of 20 year olds using their own computer servers to poke through you tax returns, your health information, and your bank accounts? No oversight.”

Actually, a poll conducted by CBS/YouGov following Trump’s speech said that 77 percent of respondents support the work of cutting government waste and spending, which is the task Trump has assigned to the newly created Department of Government Efficiency that Musk oversees.

Just a few sentences before attacking Musk, Slotkin highlighted the danger of our national debt hitting over $36 trillion. Well, how else is the U.S. going to to address the issue without cutting government spending and waste? That’s how the federal government enjoyed a surplus in the late 1990s — by cutting spending and growing the economy, the two pillars of Trump’s plan.

Slotkin decried the “chaotic” firing of federal workers.

Well, Democratic President Bill Clinton let go of hundreds of thousands of federal employees while working with the Republican Congress to achieve budget surpluses.

Slotkin went on to contend that the U.S. cannot secure the border without “fixing our broken immigration system.”

That’s a years-old Democratic talking point that turns out not to be true. February saw the lowest number of illegal border crossings in recorded U.S. history, just 8,300.

As Trump said in his Tuesday speech, “The media and our friends in the Democrat Party kept saying we needed new legislation … to secure the border. But it turned out that all we really needed was a new president.”

Slotkin also chastised Trump for the “spectacle that just took place in the Oval Office last week” when Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy tried to renegotiate, in front of the U.S. media, the minerals agreement he had already agreed to sign.

She contended that Trump was not displaying “peace through strength” and that “Ronald Reagan must be rolling in his grave.”

“Trump would have lost us the Cold War,” Slotkin claimed.

Well, she obviously forgot that Reagan walked away from the Reykjavík Summit in 1986 when then Soviet Premier Mikhail Gorbachev demanded the U.S. give up its Strategic Defense Initiative (anti-missile defense program) in exchange for a nuclear arms reduction agreement.

In 1987, Gorbachev came to the U.S. and signed a nuclear arms reduction treaty, and the U.S. kept developing SDI.

One of the key lessons of being a good negotiator: You have to be willing to walk away rather than accept a bad deal.

By the way, Zelenskyy posted on Tuesday on X that he’s now ready to sign the agreement.

One of the oddest parts of Slotkin’s rebuttal is charging that Trump doesn’t think the U.S. is an “exceptional nation.” He’s said it is on many occasions, and his whole campaign slogan was “Make America Great Again.”

In his speech at Mount Rushmore on July 4, 2020, he said, “We declare that the United States of America is the most just and exceptional nation ever to exist on Earth.”

She then closed on the old saw from the 2024 campaign that the GOP president is a threat to democracy.

That was litigated by the American people last year, and they returned Trump to office in overwhelming numbers because they recognized Democrats were the real threat to democracy by seeking to jail their chief political rival and imprison and censor his supporters.

Trump definitely won the night, and Slotkin’s rebuttal did not help the Democrats’ cause.

Truth and Accuracy

Submit a Correction →



We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

Tags:
, , , , , , ,
Share
Randy DeSoto has written more than 3,000 articles for The Western Journal since he began with the company in 2015. He is a graduate of West Point and Regent University School of Law. He is the author of the book "We Hold These Truths" and screenwriter of the political documentary "I Want Your Money."
Randy DeSoto wrote and was the assistant producer of the documentary film "I Want Your Money" about the perils of Big Government, comparing the presidencies of Ronald Reagan and Barack Obama. Randy is the author of the book "We Hold These Truths," which addresses how leaders have appealed to beliefs found in the Declaration of Independence at defining moments in our nation's history. He has been published in several political sites and newspapers.

Randy graduated from the United States Military Academy at West Point with a BS in political science and Regent University School of Law with a juris doctorate.
Birthplace
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
Nationality
American
Honors/Awards
Graduated dean's list from West Point
Education
United States Military Academy at West Point, Regent University School of Law
Books Written
We Hold These Truths
Professional Memberships
Virginia and Pennsylvania state bars
Location
Phoenix, Arizona
Languages Spoken
English
Topics of Expertise
Politics, Entertainment, Faith




Advertise with The Western Journal and reach millions of highly engaged readers, while supporting our work. Advertise Today.

Conversation